Any Salesforce developer will understand the perilous risks posed by merge conflicts. They can cause unnecessary hassle during the development processes, taking up precious time and leading to further complications later down the road. Preventing merge conflicts in Salesforce should be a number one priority for developers, but resolving them after their occurrence is just as important. In this article, we’ll delve further into merge conflicts and how developers can both prevent and fix them with efficiency. Let’s get to it.
Merge conflicts are scenarios where two distinct changes to a singular piece of metadata are not resolved automatically by a version control system. In most cases, these have to be solved using manual conflict resolution processes before any pull or merge request is able to be completed.
Timing and efficiency are pivotal benefits of DevOps systems. With this in mind, merge conflicts should always be prevented from the get-go so they can be dealt with swiftly. With planning, your development process will be smoothly maintained consistently.
Mistakes will flourish without a disciplined structure of best practices. The optimum way to solve merge conflicts is to stop them from occurring in the first place. As outlined in a previous blog, we suggest developers put five best practice pointers in place to minimize the risk of merge conflicts. Below, we go a little deeper into these five preventative techniques.
Scrum Planning
Lowering the chance of metadata overlaps is one of the critical benefits of scrum planning. During any development period, components with broader interdependencies (such as Permission Sets or Lightning Pages) should be assigned a dedicated contributor. This, in turn, will minimize the risk of overlaps and result in a merge conflict resolution. We’ve seen first-hand how valuable this simple method can be in solving Salesforce development challenges.
Inter- and Intra-Squad Collaboration
It sounds obvious, but deeper collaboration is too often overlooked as a way to prevent merge conflicts successfully. We recommend setting up time and space for DevOps squads and other team members to discuss future work openly. Awareness and communication are at the heart of any successful project.
Leverage Quality Gates
Leverage quality gates can be particularly useful when searching for a merge conflict resolution. Git Pull Requests and our own User Story Overlap Awareness feature are perfect examples of leverage quality gates in action. These can then be stopped thanks to redesigns or the coordination of DevOps duties.
Regular Back Promoting
Back-promoting should happen early and regularly if you want to prevent merge conflicts. We recommend ensuring that all DevOps team members are fully aware of the back promotion schedule to complete work in advance. For those members who prefer manually retrieving back promotions from other contributors, they must do so frequently.
Implement Monitor, Assess, and Revise Processes
Developers should never see their DevOps as linear. It’s an evolution that must be enhanced continuously when moving into future projects. Always monitor and review outcomes after every project. If this post-project review is conducted regularly, you can drastically reduce the chance of Salesforce merge conflicts occurring in the future.
Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) are vital in any Salesforce environment strategy, enabling smooth development and effective Salesforce conflict management. When multiple developers are working simultaneously, conflicts in code changes can arise, causing deployment issues. However, by implementing robust CI/CD best practices, teams can proactively identify and resolve conflicts. Additionally, a Salesforce quick deploy execution should never be underestimated.
CI/CD for Salesforce involves automating the integration of code changes into a shared repository and deploying these changes across environments. This process identifies conflicts early, allowing developers to address discrepancies promptly. Version control systems like Git help manage changes systematically, facilitating collaboration while minimizing conflicting modification risks. Automated testing validates these changes, ensuring error-free deployments that maintain Salesforce integrity. Ultimately, Salesforce business process automation can be transformative.
Implementing CI/CD methodologies for Salesforce mitigates conflicts and enhances agility and innovation within development cycles. It fosters a culture of collaboration, enabling developers to work cohesively and merge changes seamlessly. As organizations increasingly rely on Salesforce for critical business operations, establishing robust CI/CD pipelines becomes imperative for maintaining system stability, enhancing productivity, and delivering high-quality solutions.
With stellar collaboration between team members, Salesforce development challenges can be overcome much quicker. Using version control in Salesforce regularly, introducing CI/CD automation, backing up consistently, and ensuring smooth communication are all advantageous when collaborating. We’ve gathered some more Salesforce collaboration best practices below:
Version control couldn’t be easier to use and is particularly straightforward to set up. Fully integrated with the Copado DevOps platform, version control uses a familiar user interface and can play a significant role in mitigating Salesforce merge conflicts.
Copado’s version control is a Git-based source code repository hosting service, allowing team members to work collaboratively on projects closely knitted to the Copado platform. Let’s take a look at five ways you can minimize merge conflicts using version control in Salesforce:
Frequent Commits
Encourage developers to commit changes frequently in smaller, logical increments rather than large batches of code. The result is a reduced chance of conflicting changes accumulating between commits.
Merge Regularly
Incorporate changes from the main branch into feature branches frequently to stay updated with the latest codebase. This practice, known as merging upstream changes, lowers the chances of conflicts when merging back into the main branch.
Branching Strategy
Implement a clear branching strategy, such as feature branches or topic branches, to isolate changes. Developers can then work independently on specific features or fixes, minimizing conflicts when merging back into the main branch.
Communication and Coordination
Encourage team members to communicate about their work to prevent overlapping changes. If multiple developers are working on the same file or feature, coordination can help avoid conflicts.
Automated Tests
Integrate automated testing into the development workflow. Automated tests help detect conflicts early by identifying issues that arise when merging different branches together.
Clear Code Structure
Encourage a modular code structure that minimizes dependencies between different parts of the codebase. The likelihood of conflicts is then reduced when multiple developers work on different sections.
Refactoring and Clean-up
Regularly refactor and clean up the codebase. Code quality will subsequently improve while also reducing the chances of conflicts by keeping the codebase more organized and understandable.
Conflict Resolution Protocol
Establish a protocol for resolving conflicts when they occur. One solution is to generate a set of guidelines on communication about conflicts, resolutions, and documentation.
For DevOps teams fed up with endless Salesforce merge conflicts, Copado is by far your best bet. Are you interested in joining the hundreds of businesses already utilizing our Salesforce DevOps platform? Get in touch with one of our team members today.